|
Post by MungO on Sept 29, 2022 20:42:43 GMT
|
|
|
Post by dohnut on Oct 1, 2022 14:42:15 GMT
Strange that. Maybe his consultancy didn’t go s planned.
|
|
|
Post by Thor on Oct 4, 2022 13:53:56 GMT
He should remove his home details off companies House, basic error that!
|
|
|
Post by disoriented on Oct 7, 2022 11:37:34 GMT
He was great for us and of value to any institution who employs him.
|
|
|
Post by redintheface on Oct 7, 2022 12:54:54 GMT
He was great for us and of value to any institution who employs him. Wimbledon’s gain is our loss I suspect!🫤
|
|
|
Post by disoriented on Oct 8, 2022 7:12:42 GMT
He was great for us and of value to any institution who employs him. Wimbledon’s gain is our loss I suspect!🫤 Couldn’t agree more fella and that is no disrespect to Devlin.
|
|
|
Post by redintheface on Oct 8, 2022 13:32:44 GMT
Wimbledon’s gain is our loss I suspect!🫤 Couldn’t agree more fella and that is no disrespect to Devlin. Indeed- I think Devlin will do a good job but Macklin seemed to be a cut above imho.
|
|
|
Post by disoriented on Oct 9, 2022 6:50:59 GMT
Couldn’t agree more fella and that is no disrespect to Devlin. Indeed- I think Devlin will do a good job but Macklin seemed to be a cut above imho. Yes I agree.
|
|
|
Post by ostralia on Oct 15, 2022 4:40:44 GMT
Danny was certainly more high profile. This mark devlin seems to prefer keeping himself to himself, at least publicly. Very different styles. Neither is necessarily right or wrong, just different. I like Danny, but equally I can’t think of anything off the top of my head that mark devlin has done that I hugely disagree with.
|
|
|
Post by Fisch on Nov 25, 2022 15:27:03 GMT
Danny has just implemented a scheme at Wimbledon called "football for a fiver". It might catch on 😄
|
|