|
|
Post by Ffs Ling on Nov 28, 2016 17:08:34 GMT
Signs pro deal with Orient
Will Edwards now introduce him to the 1st team?
If so who should make way from Bowery Simpson Mc Allum and Palmer
Let's face it they've all been pants so far
|
|
|
|
Post by redintheface on Nov 28, 2016 17:53:27 GMT
Interesting decision for Andy E. I've not seen the kid myself but gather he is pretty much an out and out centre forward so I guess McCallum and / or Palmer would be the most obvious to make way, although having said that Bowery seems to have already fallen out of favour.In any event, it seems Sam Dalby may be slightly ahead of Abrahams in the pecking order even though he is younger , so maybe he will get the nod first?
|
|
|
|
Post by kbola on Nov 28, 2016 18:24:13 GMT
He's good in Football Manager!
|
|
|
|
Post by shane33 on Nov 29, 2016 5:25:22 GMT
He's good in Football Manager! thats good enough for me - put him in |
|
|
|
Post by BrewmasterO on Nov 29, 2016 18:32:58 GMT
I think Dalby is more of a typical centre forward/target man (boy - only 16) with good ball skills, able to hold on to the ball.
Abrahams is a striker who's only aim is to score goals (not a bad thing) and assists are very secondary.
BOTH could play but must be eased in slowly or as we've seen with Semedo they could be destroyed.
|
|
|
|
Post by redintheface on Nov 29, 2016 18:49:15 GMT
I think Dalby is more of a typical centre forward/target man (boy - only 16) with good ball skills, able to hold on to the ball. Abrahams is a striker who's only aim is to score goals (not a bad thing) and assists are very secondary. BOTH could play but must be eased in slowly or as we've seen with Semedo they could be destroyed. An old saying Brewmaster but "if they're good enough , they're old enough". Given the awful performances our "established" strikers have put in thus far and frankly no sign of any improvement, I don't see why at least one of them should'nt get a start or two with the other perhaps on the bench. I agree though the timing and handling of the situation by Edwards is critical. |
|
