|
Post by vinnyh on Feb 9, 2024 7:33:14 GMT
So looks like we'll see this in the FA Cup next season.
Im for it to a certain extent, though my concern is how will affect games when a team is down to ten or less players.
What are others thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by dohnut on Feb 9, 2024 8:05:15 GMT
If you don’t want to play with 10 men for 5/10 minutes then learn to stop doing silly stuff. I doubt blue cards will be issued that quickly. But for say gobbing off or Kicking the ball away type stuff I’d sooner a sin bin than a yellow and ultimately ban. It will curb some of the behaviour we see more and more of in games.
Yellows and reds won’t disappear, they will still be dished out for the more serious stuff.
Works in other sports. Worth a try.
|
|
|
Post by redintheface on Feb 9, 2024 8:31:31 GMT
More tinkering around the edges which will cause more problems than it solves I suspect. Not a fan personally.
|
|
|
Post by kbola on Feb 9, 2024 9:07:07 GMT
It will be fun when the goalkeeper is sent to the sin bin
|
|
|
Post by dohnut on Feb 9, 2024 9:40:06 GMT
More tinkering around the edges which will cause more problems than it solves I suspect. Not a fan personally. I can understand that view. But times change, the game moves on. Players antics evolve, not always for the best. Laws need to adapt accordingly. Not every change will work but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t give it a try. Then If it don’t, bin it, no pun intended. People ridiculed the use of chalk lines to mark 10 yards. Now it’s a good part of the game. That too was tinkering. The juries still out on VAR. But, for example,I am definitely not a fan of players constantly in the ear of the referee (managers too for that matter) or the evolvement of what we now sanitise as game management. Or constantly trying to steal yardage at free kicks and throws. Stuff that rarely unless a last resort ends up with a card. Let’s call it as it is - sometimes cheating. Trying to gain unfair advantage. So if something can eradicate all this rubbish, it has to be worth a try.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2024 9:43:29 GMT
I'm calling it now. Like VAR, this will merely lead to more controversy and incentivise more wishy-washy refereeing. Frankly I think refs should simply give out more yellows and reds. Give the players a rest!
|
|
|
Post by dohnut on Feb 9, 2024 9:58:16 GMT
I'm calling it now. Like VAR, this will merely lead to more controversy and incentivise more wishy-washy refereeing. Frankly I think refs should simply give out more yellows and reds. Give the players a rest! Does VAR create more controversy? Maybe. Largely due to the pundits. But referees make mistakes, no criticism as I’m an ex, low-level, referee. Anything that helps reduce it has to be good. Case in point, the semi of the African nations cup. I was watching live and convinced an extra time challenge was a penalty. The referee didn’t give it. Didn’t actually give anything assuming a fair challenge. Punditry in overdrive. VAR then proved two things. The first it was a foul, red card duly administered and the second was the initial contact was outside the box so no penalty. Had VAR not been used that incident in the near last minutes of extra time would have been dissected for ever. VAR when used correctly can be good so long as the referee remains the sole decision maker using whatever tools available to come to the right decision. More reds and yellows? Interesting view. I’d like to understand why you feel that is the right way to go.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2024 10:50:45 GMT
Case in point, the semi of the African nations cup. I was watching live and convinced an extra time challenge was a penalty. The referee didn’t give it. Didn’t actually give anything assuming a fair challenge. Punditry in overdrive. VAR then proved two things. The first it was a foul, red card duly administered and the second was the initial contact was outside the box so no penalty. Citing such examples assumes that the ref still wouldn't have given it had he not had VAR to fall back on. We simply don't know that. I don't think it would be controversial to suggest that refs at the top level are now less assertive when it comes to decisions they aren't absolutely sure of. One thing we can be sure of is that it certainly doesn't cut down on hyperbolic punditry and criticism of refs. I simply think they should be given more liberally for infringements like diving, time-wasting, and dissent (obviously they tried to do something about the latter earlier in the season but seems to have now more or less reverted to the norm). I don't think we necessarily need to see more straight reds, but I assume there'd be an increase in second yellows. I understand the concern about red cards potentially ruining games, but so do these infringements, and imo a red card is just as likely to make a game more exciting as it is to ruin it anyway. I genuinely hate players getting away with red card offences just because it's early in the game.
|
|
|
Post by redshank on Feb 9, 2024 11:57:48 GMT
Refs have enough problems during the match,no need for more making it difficult on a single judgement.
|
|
|
Post by Fisch on Feb 9, 2024 12:14:05 GMT
Brown tripped a Vale runner from behind to stop him getting through to a dangerous position. That's cheating but is part of the modern game, he got a yellow, everyone knew and accepted it, and the game continued. Question is, would Brown have been more or less incentivised to do it under the blue card procedure (as currently envisaged)? I can't see it will make a heap of difference. Theo engages in heavy duty verbals as part of his game and often gets yellows for it, would he be more or less likely to button it under the blue card system? I can see RW trotting back and forth from the dugout in every game.
|
|
|
Post by dohnut on Feb 9, 2024 13:44:45 GMT
Case in point, the semi of the African nations cup. I was watching live and convinced an extra time challenge was a penalty. The referee didn’t give it. Didn’t actually give anything assuming a fair challenge. Punditry in overdrive. VAR then proved two things. The first it was a foul, red card duly administered and the second was the initial contact was outside the box so no penalty. Citing such examples assumes that the ref still wouldn't have given it had he not had VAR to fall back on. We simply don't know that. I don't think it would be controversial to suggest that refs at the top level are now less assertive when it comes to decisions they aren't absolutely sure of. One thing we can be sure of is that it certainly doesn't cut down on hyperbolic punditry and criticism of refs. I simply think they should be given more liberally for infringements like diving, time-wasting, and dissent (obviously they tried to do something about the latter earlier in the season but seems to have now more or less reverted to the norm). I don't think we necessarily need to see more straight reds, but I assume there'd be an increase in second yellows. I understand the concern about red cards potentially ruining games, but so do these infringements, and imo a red card is just as likely to make a game more exciting as it is to ruin it anyway. I genuinely hate players getting away with red card offences just because it's early in the game. We do know that as a fact. He didn't give it allowing play to continue until alerted, I don’t know how or by whom. So no need for assumptions. Two situations that would have gone unpunished had VAR not been used. As for referees being more assertive. I personally don’t know the answer to that. What I do know is that every decision is shown in slow motion with pundits praising or criticising every decision, sometimes ironically both (even they don’t always agree having viewed incidents endlessly). A referee has a split second to decide, and it ain’t easy. An example, a wise old referee told us during our training to never have the whistle near the mouth. If it’s by your side it gives you an extra half a second to think before deciding to blow (or not). That is pressure in big games. Even at the level I refereed emotions ran high. VAR is there to provide a referee with the same opportunity as the pundits, a second look. Decisions that have major outcomes. Can that be wrong? You make some valid observations about cards.
|
|
|
Post by dohnut on Feb 9, 2024 13:56:06 GMT
Brown tripped a Vale runner from behind to stop him getting through to a dangerous position. That's cheating but is part of the modern game, he got a yellow, everyone knew and accepted it, and the game continued. Question is, would Brown have been more or less incentivised to do it under the blue card procedure (as currently envisaged)? I can't see it will make a heap of difference. Theo engages in heavy duty verbals as part of his game and often gets yellows for it, would he be more or less likely to button it under the blue card system? I can see RW trotting back and forth from the dugout in every game. Part of the modern game for sure and it will never go away. Best way to view it is both teams do it so it’s a level playing field in that respect. Accepted. A card is punishment. Red or Yellow depending on last man etc. Reality of the game. Blue is a fascinating one and the Theo verbals a good thing to look at. To my mind it’s this level of infringement that Blues would apply to. And RW for that matter. Not too sure verbals warrant a yellow unless persistent or let’s say ugly. Routine part of the game and officials are grown up and learn to cop-a deaf-un. But when it’s OTT then maybe 10 minutes to cool off is no bad thing. Better than stacking up yellows and missing a whole 90. Or in Richie’s case a big fine and 3 Matches.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2024 14:46:06 GMT
We do know that as a fact. He didn't give it allowing play to continue until alerted, I don’t know how or by whom. So no need for assumptions. Two situations that would have gone unpunished had VAR not been used. We can't possibly know how he would've reffed the game without VAR. It's very likely the ref doesn't either. We don't know if he doesn't make a decision when he otherwise would've because he knows VAR will pull it back if need be. All we know is how he reffed the game with VAR because that's what happened. I love learning stuff like this, thanks 🙏
|
|
|
Post by redintheface on Feb 9, 2024 17:32:00 GMT
Brown tripped a Vale runner from behind to stop him getting through to a dangerous position. That's cheating but is part of the modern game, he got a yellow, everyone knew and accepted it, and the game continued. Question is, would Brown have been more or less incentivised to do it under the blue card procedure (as currently envisaged)? I can't see it will make a heap of difference. Theo engages in heavy duty verbals as part of his game and often gets yellows for it, would he be more or less likely to button it under the blue card system? I can see RW trotting back and forth from the dugout in every game. Nailed it Fisch! My own opinion is that all it will do is simply bring more simulation to encourage cards to be shown and negative play and time wasting as teams “ hunker down “ to withstand a 10 minute spell with a man short. I really don’t like the idea at all I’m afraid.
|
|
|
Post by Thor on Feb 9, 2024 17:41:52 GMT
The blue card is already in youth football and I had a player shown it and he had 8 mins in the sin bin. You can't sub them and your down to 10 for that period of time. It didn't affect us as such as we reorganised to cover for it.
I've seen the media back lash and the only reason it will be a problem is Premier players are going to be blue carded all the time. I'm fed up watching them telling the ref to f off as all that does is give kids permission to do the same. Trouble is the game is back to front, as they bring these laws into youth football which is fine, but you need to stop the behaviour in the pro teams and the kids will follow suit. They just copy what they see on the TV. Start at the top and work it down, you'll soon see a change in attitudes.
I see Merson was quite vocal in his opposition and I feel that outburst was due as he knows what's coming and you'll be down to 8v11 or something like that and as a spectacle it will be game over.
If a keeper gets sin binned an on field player goes in goal, when the time is up the keeper rejoins as an outfield player and it is only after the next stoppage can they go back in goal.
|
|
|
Post by Fisch on Feb 9, 2024 17:44:41 GMT
Thor describes a nightmare.
|
|
|
Post by SW O on Feb 9, 2024 18:09:50 GMT
The only rationale I can see for a sin bin is when a foul causes a player to leave the field temporarily. To be down to 10 men because of the other side's conduct isn't rational - the player who committed the foul should be taken off for so long as the injured player is off the field.
|
|
|
Post by dohnut on Feb 9, 2024 18:15:51 GMT
Thor describes a nightmare. The real question is whether blue cards will reduce or increase the nightmare. i dislike with a passion some of the antics professional footballers display on a regular basis. And I don’t see it getting better anytime soon. Nor do I see coaches on the touchline dealing with it or setting a good example. If trying blue cards is a bad idea, what should be done? I don’t see an issue with giving this a try. If it don’t work then let’s find out.
|
|
|
Post by kbola on Feb 9, 2024 19:29:18 GMT
I believe they have already been trialing this in non league football for a while now
|
|
|
Post by dohnut on Feb 9, 2024 21:08:35 GMT
I believe they have already been trialing this in non league football for a while now I watch lower league football and have never seen it though Thor tells us it’s used in Kids football. Didn’t know that. I’m not advocating its introduction without control. The impact of such things tends to be different than the planned expectations. But I certainly agree with the principle of trialling in the professional game. Why not? Could be great, could be a disaster. Nothing wrong in finding out. Plenty of anti comments when reds and yellows were introduced over 50 years ago. Plenty of issues when substituting for injuries was introduced and what a farce that was. Players pretending to be injured. Laughable. Yet today we have up to 5 in one game and is an integral part of the modern game. Playoffs were criticised by some, but many like them now. Things change. And who can remember reelection to the football league, now a thing of the past.
|
|