|
|
Post by Thor on Mar 19, 2024 9:13:25 GMT
All the papers are running stories saying that Kate was out with William at a farm shop. There are pictures and a video.
Not sure, but it doesn't look anything like her. Maybe she has had a face-lift? Cos the person in the articles does not look like our princess.
What are others seeing?
|
|
|
|
Post by Thor on Mar 19, 2024 9:14:35 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by mrb on Mar 19, 2024 9:44:45 GMT
No make up possibly?
|
|
|
|
Post by eca on Mar 19, 2024 10:14:28 GMT
These are two major wars going on atm do the public really care a dam what is wrong with her and what shop she going too to buy her chicken eggs or groceries
|
|
|
|
Post by alfresco on Mar 19, 2024 10:18:13 GMT
I also think that the woman purporting to be Kate, doesn't look like her
|
|
|
|
Post by redshank on Mar 19, 2024 11:57:05 GMT
These are two major wars going on atm do the public really care a dam what is wrong with her and what shop she going too to buy her chicken eggs or groceries I do,our future Queen. |
|
|
|
Post by eca on Mar 19, 2024 12:08:18 GMT
These are two major wars going on atm do the public really care a dam what is wrong with her and what shop she going too to buy her chicken eggs or groceries I do,our future Queen. I am sure you are a caring person to your family and neighbours but seriously a future queen and wether she wearing bloody make up and buying groceries it’s being rather over sensitive, when there are far more important world affairs to focus on . Royalty is on the way out, unfortunately it will take a few more generations before society finally come to their senses and eradicate a group of parasites floundering around sponsored by the tax payer and living off revenue of land they did not create but acquired historically without any work. |
|
|
|
Post by redshank on Mar 19, 2024 12:39:08 GMT
What on Earth can I do about world affairs,I care for our political system as the King as head of state.
You have your views I have mine.To argue whether to have a Monarchy has always been around.We tried it once without, with Oliver Cromwell as dictator and when he died it was handed on to his son Richard.It was so grim the people wanted the restoration of the Monarchy and it happened with Charles 11.
Our politicians are answerable to the King as head of state.He does not interfere but can suggest.I think that is a good set up,far better than a president who is all powerful.
|
|
|
|
Post by dohnut on Mar 19, 2024 12:55:09 GMT
I am sure you are a caring person to your family and neighbours but seriously a future queen and wether she wearing bloody make up and buying groceries it’s being rather over sensitive, when there are far more important world affairs to focus on . Royalty is on the way out, unfortunately it will take a few more generations before society finally come to their senses and eradicate a group of parasites floundering around sponsored by the tax payer and living off revenue of land they did not create but acquired historically without any work. Shame you are ignorant of the facts. But each to their own. With a view like that sensible discussion is pointless |
|
|
|
Post by eca on Mar 19, 2024 12:59:52 GMT
What on Earth can I do about world affairs,I care for our political system as the King as head of state. You have your views I have mine.To argue whether to have a Monarchy has always been around.We tried it once without, with Oliver Cromwell as dictator and when he died it was handed on to his son Richard.It was so grim the people wanted the restoration of the Monarchy and it happened with Charles 11. Our politicians are answerable to the King as head of state.He does not interfere but can suggest.I think that is a good set up,far better than a president who is all powerful. We won’t continue our difference of an opinion- which is certainly not an argument One cannot anticipate a future of improvement's to society based on what occurred centuries ago - that is absurd. The British system is on the way out and hopefully it develops to a more inspiring one which is not biased on birth circumstances. Regarding world affairs of course none of us can change the events all I am concerned with is the apparent obsession of people focused on a human who is buying her groceries and has had an operation - which I personally find perverse irrespective of their status |
|
|
|
Post by eca on Mar 19, 2024 13:09:04 GMT
I am sure you are a caring person to your family and neighbours but seriously a future queen and wether she wearing bloody make up and buying groceries it’s being rather over sensitive, when there are far more important world affairs to focus on . Royalty is on the way out, unfortunately it will take a few more generations before society finally come to their senses and eradicate a group of parasites floundering around sponsored by the tax payer and living off revenue of land they did not create but acquired historically without any work. Shame you are ignorant of the facts. But each to their own. With a view like that sensible discussion is pointless Trust big headed Donut to enter a view that is personally abusive - iif I was you I would stick to your old pathetic personal IT work history mantra - which you have successfully bored everyone on here and the other board for such a prolonged time . I have made it absolutely clear to you before, I find you a total Stool and your views on any subject or comment of mine are worthless to me and hopefully next season you may find another clubs forum to voice your posts |
|
|
|
Post by mickeysbullock on Mar 19, 2024 13:54:54 GMT
What on Earth can I do about world affairs,I care for our political system as the King as head of state. You have your views I have mine.To argue whether to have a Monarchy has always been around.We tried it once without, with Oliver Cromwell as dictator and when he died it was handed on to his son Richard.It was so grim the people wanted the restoration of the Monarchy and it happened with Charles 11. Our politicians are answerable to the King as head of state.He does not interfere but can suggest.I think that is a good set up,far better than a president who is all powerful. The same political and monarchy who doesn't care about you at all? A political system and monarchy heavily influenced by the WEF that is so, so, so corrupt that it needs that needs total and utter reform. To believe that our politicians are answerable to anyone apart from the party whip is laughable. To quote George Carlin 'this country was bought and paid for years ago'. As for voting it is the adult equivalent to writing a letter to Father Christmas. |
|
|
|
Post by eca on Mar 19, 2024 14:18:34 GMT
Micky Bullock who I remember we signed for 10k was one of my all time favourite orient players.
He was bulky but he was energetic and I can still visualise him playing.
Any poster using his name is absolutely fine by me
|
|
|
|
Post by redshank on Mar 19, 2024 14:28:15 GMT
What on Earth can I do about world affairs,I care for our political system as the King as head of state. You have your views I have mine.To argue whether to have a Monarchy has always been around.We tried it once without, with Oliver Cromwell as dictator and when he died it was handed on to his son Richard.It was so grim the people wanted the restoration of the Monarchy and it happened with Charles 11. Our politicians are answerable to the King as head of state.He does not interfere but can suggest.I think that is a good set up,far better than a president who is all powerful. The same political and monarchy who doesn't care about you at all? A political system and monarchy heavily influenced by the WEF that is so, so, so corrupt that it needs that needs total and utter reform. To believe that our politicians are answerable to anyone apart from the party whip is laughable. To quote George Carlin 'this country was bought and paid for years ago'. As for voting it is the adult equivalent to writing a letter to Father Christmas. You don't care about me so what is the difference.To quote Ludvig van Beethoven,I will hear in heaven. |
|
|
|
Post by Thor on Mar 19, 2024 15:40:58 GMT
Getting back to the question which was do you think the person put forward is Kate.
|
|
|
|
Post by kbola on Mar 19, 2024 15:52:04 GMT
Baldie and Kate are clearly over. Only the dapper Prince Harry and his STUNNING consort the Princess Meghan can save us now
|
|
|
|
Post by estaing on Mar 19, 2024 16:30:13 GMT
Baldie and Kate are clearly over. Only the dapper Prince Harry and his STUNNING consort the Princess Meghan can save us now Lol …. Some may think you are throwing out more bait than “last word”.  |
|
|
|
Post by kbola on Mar 19, 2024 17:24:03 GMT
Baldie and Kate are clearly over. Only the dapper Prince Harry and his STUNNING consort the Princess Meghan can save us now Lol …. Some may think you are throwing out more bait than “last word”. However I am but a humble postman, He is The President of Business. My opinion means little in comparison. e |
|
|
|
Post by brentwoodo on Mar 19, 2024 20:21:37 GMT
She’s just had a bit of work done…  |
|
|
|
Post by dohnut on Mar 19, 2024 20:25:59 GMT
Shame you are ignorant of the facts. But each to their own. With a view like that sensible discussion is pointless Trust big headed Donut to enter a view that is personally abusive - iif I was you I would stick to your old pathetic personal IT work history mantra - which you have successfully bored everyone on here and the other board for such a prolonged time . I have made it absolutely clear to you before, I find you a total Stool and your views on any subject or comment of mine are worthless to me and hopefully next season you may find another clubs forum to voice your posts On a more serious note, do your research, knowledge is a wonderful thing and often removes bias. As an aside, I shall continue to post as I see fit. Don’t want to read them? The clue is in the name I post under, so feel free to ignore. |
|
